In a recent article I wrote about Obama’s ties to Islam, I attempted to connect several dots that point to him speaking in some type of code, e.g. "campaigning in all 57 Muslim states," “my Muslim faith,” the use of the words “pig” and “fish,” and his background/relationships with relatives in Kenya (http://newswithviews.com/Walker/jill29.htm). However, something gnawed at me that led me to believe all the dots weren’t connected.   

For example, why did/does Obama find “solace” in his relationships with those who score a10-out-of-10 on the rebellion scale? Folks like Ayers and his cronies are not exactly mainstream America nor is the “Reverend” Jeremiah Wright. And what’s the connection between his Muslim background, and his anti-America, socialist background (inculcated in him as a small child by his mother, father, and eventually his stepfather, the latter of which were both Muslims)? Add the corrupt Chicago political machinery through which he rose to some sort of power and you have the makings of either a dormant sleeper cell or one who believes he can single-handedly destroy and then remake the U.S. in his own twisted imagewithout “we the people” batting an eyelash. Somewhere along the line, Obama became beholden to the Muslims and that IOU has probably come due. Regarding Obama’s admittance to Harvard Law School, Jack Cashill wrote: 

“As far back as 1988, however, Obama had serious pull. He would need it. As previously reported, Khalid al-Mansour, principle adviser to Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, lobbied friends like Manhattan Borough President Percy Sutton to intervene at Harvard on Obama's behalf. An orthodox Muslim, al-Mansour has not met the crackpot anti-Semitic theory he could not embrace. As for bin Talal, in October 2001, New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani sent his $10 million relief check back un-cashed after the Saudi billionaire blamed 9/11 on America (http://wnd.com/index.php?pageId=74877). 

Hence, Obama was admitted because of Muslim connections, not because of merit. This alone makes him guilty of the charge he makes against his opponents -- cronyism. The same is true, Cashill wrote, for his role as president of the Harvard Law Review. He never wrote a single article. The only paper he did write was heavily edited and demanded the death of babies that survived abortions.  

So why did al-Mansour go to such lengths for Obama unless there was a quid pro quo that hasn’t been brought to light? Maybe the quo of the agreement has finally come due? “We the people” only have to look at what’s happened in Great Britain with the enforcement of Sharia law for the ramifications of an Obama presidency to become crystal clear (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2957428/Sharia-law-courts-operating-in-Britain.html).

Proof of Obama’s relationship with “cutting edge” terrorists was his unpublicized May 14, 2008, meeting at Macomb Community College with Imam Hassan Qazwini.  The Imam heads the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, Michigan, and according to Debbie Schlussel, Qazwini is the front man in the U.S. for the terror group Hezbollah. He also openly supports HAMAS-ide bombings. I’m sure he was dancing on the head of a pin on 9/11. He’s a close friend of Hezbollah’s spiritual leader, Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, who called on Hezbollah terrorists “to kill more than 300 U.S. Marines and U.S. Embassy civilians in cold blood.” His mosque is a hotbed of anti-American sentiment where rallies and celebrations are held in support of Hezbollah,and many of his congregants are money launderers for that terror group. All this is taking place in America while the Democrats demand hate-crimes legislation.

Qazwini’s mosque has hosted visitors like Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, a racist at minimum. And it was Qazwini who defined Farrakhan as “our dear brother,” and “a freedom fighter” (http://www.debbiesch... 2008/05/the_company_he. html; and http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2008/05/six-degrees-of-barack-obama-updated.html).

For whom was he a “freedom fighter?” He certainly isn’t a freedom fighter for Americans, and definitely not for the Jewish people whom Farrakhan calls “the forces of Satan.” This alleged freedom fighter has called for a “jihad” on the American people.” I believe this is the epitome of hate speech; or was it just the prelude for Obama descending into the “Greek” temple as the Twelfth Imam? Perhaps he’s not the anti-Christ, but he sure is a good precursor -- the murder of aborted babies born alive (a nice sacrifice to the forces of darkness), support of the homosexual “movement,” the destruction of “white America.”

But connecting ALL the dots is easy when we understand Black Liberation Theology, which was founded in North America by James Cone, a Protestant minister who experienced the cruelties of segregation while growing up in Arkansas. He saw how white Christians treated blacks, even after federal desegregation of the South. The behavior of white southern Christians did not square with what he called the Christian messages of peace (was that one of the messages?) and loving thy neighbor as thyself. Black Liberation Theology grew out of the desire (as the Jews and other people groups have always desired) liberation from various forms of racism, oppression, and poverty.

“Cone argued that the white church and white theologians had all failed in their duties to uphold biblical principles of helping the poor and marginalized of society. Ergo, it was no longer acceptable to leave the interpretation of the Bible to white Christians. Blacks must take responsibility for their own religion and their own relationship with God. Black liberation theology has a great deal in common with the Black Power movement that also developed in the 1960s” (http://atheism.about... od/theology/ a/lib_black.htm).

Cone wrote in his book, Black Theology and Black Power: “Freedom is not a gift, but a responsibility, and thus must be taken against the will of those who hold us in bondage.” Others have uttered those sentiments throughout the ages and they were, in theory, quite correct. However, you cannot walk in the light and have favor from God if you hate your brother, whether you’re white or black. The problem with Black Liberation Theology is what happens when the wrong people, e.g. “Reverend” Jeremiah Wright, foment the wrong type of thinking. Black Liberation hates the middle class, so don’t bank on higher taxes producing refunds to the very class Obama detests.

According to Jeffrey Schmidt, “To listen to Wright -- more an apostle of the left than the Christian church -- the model for blacks is alienation, deep resentment, separation and grievance. All of which leads to militancy. Militancy is important. It's the sword dangled over the head of society. Either fork over more tax dollars, government services and patronage or else. And unlike the Reverend Moss [Wright’s successor at Obama’s church] and his kindred, I'll specify the ‘else’ as civil unrest, disruptions in cities, rioting in the streets, [dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria (with thanks to Bill Murray)]. Keeping blacks who fall into the orbit of a Reverend Wright at a near-boil is a card used by leftist agitators to serve their ends: they want bigger and more pervasive government -- and they want badly to run it” (http://www.americant... agenda_of_ black_liber.html). (I remember the frenzy that occurred when they ran the city school systems into the ground in Durham, N.C. and then the NAACP demanded there be one school district for city and county. And Black Liberation Theology wants to run the whole country? But, I do digress a bit . . .)

Forget, as Schmidt wrote, the Civil War and the thousands who died to end slavery, the civil rights movement and the many whites who gave their time and, in some cases, their lives to see justice for blacks in America, and the whites in government who voted to end unequal treatment of blacks, including affirmative action (which many view as reverse discrimination). Then understand that the messages of Black Liberation Theology, as espoused by Wright and his ilk are music to the ears of Islamists like Mansour and Qazwini who share a maniacal hatred of America.  

Add to that list Emil Jones, Jr., Bill Ayers, Bernadette Dohrn, Frank Marshall Davis, and a host of other “model” anti-Americans and Obama’s affiliation with Trinity United Church of Christ, a bastion for socialism and racial animus, becomes clear. He can appear to be a Christian, though his Church has wildly perverted Christianity and Cone’s belief in a message of peace and brotherly love into one of race baiting and race hatred. However, it’s an acceptable institution to the Muslims who support Obama because the messages ring the same.

The Muslims are mortgaged heavily in Obama and they’re clearly calling in their IOUs, promissory notes, and loans. Let’s just hope that Lehman Brothers is holding the mortgage on Obama’s soul because right now the forces of darkness have a strong lien on it. Obama’s “church” was a fraud to get voters to believe he’s a Christian. In reality, the ideologies espoused by Wright align perfectly with Islam which is why those to whom Obama is indebted don’t mind his membership in such a lofty den of “brotherly love.” It’s just more of the same scam that allowed Obama to move through the ranks to become the poster boy for the Democrat party. God (who is not Allah) help us all if he does win the election. Obama isn’t nearly as good at paying back those who help him as he is taking what “we the people” have to offer  . . . as has been documented by his lack of charitable donations. 

Frank is one of several blacks I know who did not vote for the “O.” Most are well educated and extremely concerned that an Obama presidency will reflect badly on the entire black community. It was their hope that the first black presidential candidate would be someone better than a street agitator with few, if any, credentials other than associating deliberately with those who want to destroy the United States. Frank exemplified this awareness when he watched a program on Liberia.

“I have nothing in common with those folks because I was born and raised here,” he said. “I don’t have a clue about their struggles, can’t understand their anger and hostility, and wouldn’t want to grow up in such a hate-filled country.”

Hmmmm. Didn’t the “O” tell us that’s what’s wrong with America? Didn’t he take us back decades, nay centuries, when he reminded blacks, with the assistance and not-so-kind words of the “Reverend” Jeremiah Wright, that they’re still being screwed by the American political system. As he put it, “Bill Clinton did us the way he did Monica Lewinsky.”

If that’s the case, why are the Clintons running around campaigning for the “O.” I would think there’d be some distance there, especially after the “O” and the media screwed Hillary worse than Bill did Monica, with or without the blue dress.

So, Frank voted for McCain/Palin because he doesn’t like the way the media and the democrats have treated them. “It’s one thing to attack their policies, and another to attack them as people,” he said. “Palin’s a real American. She may be white, but she’s walked a bit in my shoes. She’s worked hard to support her family. She knows what hard work is and I believe she’ll work hard for folks like me. Obama just wants to steal from me.”  

Bear in mind that when I met Frank he was working at a fast food restaurant and was still trying to pass the GED—without studying properly for the test. His reading skills were in the toilet and his math skills were lower. Frank was a classic example of special education gone wrong and social promotions. Then I tutored Frank in language arts and some teachers tutored him in math.

Frank passed the equivalency test and is now enrolled at the local community college. He also works full time as a specialist for a local department store and recently rented a small apartment of his own. His reading level has soared to college level and his book supply takes up half his living room. More than that, his ability to think critically has exploded. While discussing the election with me this morning he said something that blew me away.  

“Obama has no loyalty to America. He hates too many people groups, including his own. Having Obama in the White House would be the same as having a Japanese or German president in the White House during World War II,” he said. “I see him as more of a spy who has infiltrated this nation than a loyal American. He’s a spy inside for America’s enemies.”

While Frank is 27 years old, I can’t help but think “out of the mouths of babes,” when I listened to him reason his way through the election process. “I grew up with a father who hated white America. He was the worst kind of racist because he never took responsibility for his own actions. Instead, he blamed everyone else for his lot in life. Whites didn’t make him a womanizer, he did. Whites didn’t make him buy drugs; he did that on his own.”  

Frank voted in his precinct which is largely black with a sprinkling of whites. He didn’t care what anyone thought. He talked with a woman on line about the need to work hard for what you want in life. As he put it, “It’s not the government’s job to take care of me. It’s up to me to take care of me.”

There are a few who understand . . . if only there were more.

Pondering the machinations of those on the left side of the political spectrum is a daunting task, at best. Having marginally been on that side at one time, I decided to revisit my reasons for my semi-liberal choices. That was almost as daunting as my original pondering, but I finally realized that what attracted me to that side was the "anything goes" attitude of those raggamuffin hippies of yore.

It wasn't so much that they didn't believe government didn't belong in the abortion, free-love (which isn't free and comes at great cost) venues, it was just the opposite. They didn't want to leave government out of the mix, they wanted our government, founded on Biblical truths, values and principles, to do a complete 180 legislatively and judicially.

Since the late 1960s, I've watched the left chip away (with large, ungodly chisels) at everything sacred and decent about the United States. Our churches and synagogues became social clubs, our schools became government training grounds for the atheists and other anti-God miscreants, and our families were shredded into barely recognizable remnants of the families in which we spent our childhoods. Mostly, God, in the eyes of many Americans, became whatever they wanted Him to be, notwithstanding how He defined Himself in Scripture. Right about now, God should be suing all of us for defamation.

Adding insult to injury, when those He rescued from spiritual rebellion, finally were right with Him, we didn't fight back. We sat by complacently thinking it couldn't get worse, but it did. Repeatedly, we told ourselves that the worst was over and our children would come to their senses. After all, we were raising them properly. And while we said this to ourselves, we stopped going to church, stopped worshipping God (as opposed to Allah, the moon god), and embraced everything secular. We even believed that liberal lie that the Founders really did put "separation of church and state" into our Constitution (unless you live in California where only Judeo-Christianity is targeted while Islam is taught to school children).

In a nutshell, "we the people" blew it big time; and then we blamed government for all the ills that were spawned in California and made their way east . . . even into the Bible Belt.

Finally, they told us that God died. Yes, indeedy, the God of the Bible, the Creator of the Universe had finally packed it in, and they said we were well rid of Him and His pesky Son and the Holy Spirit. After all, who needs them now that we've become enlightened? Morals? Forget it. Morals are relative, they said, to whatever we want, to whatever the situation reveals. Absent solid standards of morality, they created an atmosphere in which we drifted like garbage floating in a polluted river.

And now, many of us who pray daily, pray often, pray from the heart are left to hope to the God they said was dead that it's not too late to save a few more sick souls from a bad ending. We pray that it's not over for the United States. We pray that God will intervene and set us ALL spinning back in His direction. Unfortunately, like the serpent in the Garden of Eden, there is still rebellion in the wind and God's competitors are still arguing about who will reign supreme.

Rumor has it that this competition is fierce. According to that bastion of  brotherly love and charity (unless you're Caucasian or Jewish, etc.), Louis Farrakhan, and Bill Ayers (who dedicated his book to Lucifer), Jesus isn't needed anymore because we have Barry "The One" Obama. Oh the thrill the left feels when they talk about their newly crowned messiah who will lead them into a new America that will bear no resemblance to anything godly. Nope, that's not what they want and there's one good reason: SIN.

With God--Father, Son, and Holy Spirit--acknowledgement of sin means realizing that anything God wouldn't do, that we do, is sin. Not so with Barry. Sin, to Barry, is a whole new deal that's in direct contravention to the Scriptures.

I haven't read one word in the Bible about race warfare, have you? Or abortion being godly? I haven't read one word about stealing elections to win because winning is the name of the game. I haven't read one word about lying being acceptable to get the gold ring. But that's exactly what their new, improved messiah deems acceptable. The left finally has a "god" who will let them do as they please while he and they persecute the rest of us. They have a "god" who will destroy all that is good while blaming "we the people" for the destruction. They have a "god" who will make Bill Clinton look like a walk in the park.

The left needs a created messiah because the real one--the Creator, Jesus (Yeshua)--demands more than their pride and arrogance will permit. He asks them to repent for their sins--sins that have nothing to do with the pitiful political sludge spawned by Obama and his cabal: Wright, Ayers, Farrakhan, et al. (Odd that Islam says it's not a sin to do anything that advances the cause of Islam: killing, murdering, rape, lying, stealing, bombing . . . the list is probably endless. Yep, just say you're advancing Islam and it's suddenly acceptable.)

Should the "O" win the election--and lest God (the real one) intervenes--it's going to be tough times for those who won't follow the great "O." I'd say "take his mark," but I'm still not certain that he's the anti-Christ. Close, but maybe not. However, he's not the God I worship and I do hope he forgives me for not voting for him. I just can't advance his causes because they run contrary to everything my God--the one I pray will bless America--said in His Word.

With all the justifiable hoopla about Barry O's relationship with domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn, I can't help but wonder how the hand of the law didn't reel them in long ago. There's no statute of limitations on murder, and Ayers and Dohrn have all but admitted to their roles in the bombings of the Pentagon, the Capital Building, and the bombing of a police station wherein one police officer was killed. A rather lengthy history on the Weather Underground can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weatherman_(organization). The current issues surrounding Ayers, in particular, are more interesting. According to Matthew K. Tabor:

“Bill Ayers’ March election to the post of Vice President of Curriculum Studies for the American Educational Research Association [AERA] raised a few eyebrows - albeit too few - in the great education debate. There’s been quite a bit of discussion since Sol Stern wrote his most recent piece about Ayers in City Journal in which he introduces, as have some pundits, Ayers’ connection to Senator Barack Obama ["Obama's Real Ayers Problem"]. Primary politics aside, some thought that electing an unrepentant terrorist to AERA’s ranks was a mistake; others, however, found that insinuation shameful http://www.matthewktabor.com/ 2008/05/19/revisiting-aera-bill-ayers-the-weather-underground-and-public-education/ and http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/ eduwonkette /2008/05/dean_millots_comment_on_the_ay.html.

 “The [AERA] Council might consider whether it’s prudent to allow a former terrorist to join its ranks—particularly a man who said as late as 2001 that “I don’t regret setting bombs; I feel we didn’t do enough.” …

“Is there any doubt that the election of a former terrorist to the organization’s governance body is 'contrary to the interests' of the Association?

In another article (http://www.matthewktabor.com/2008/10/17/yes-bill-ayers-is-a-school-destroyer-social-justice-aint-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/), Tabor included a statement by Sol Stern, Contributing Editor to City Journal and a Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow:

“I’ve studied Mr. Ayers’s work for years and read most of his books. His hatred of America is as virulent as when he planted a bomb at the Pentagon. And this hatred informs his educational “reform” efforts. Of course, Mr. Obama isn’t going to appoint him to run the education department. But the media mainstreaming of a figure like Mr. Ayers could have terrible consequences for the country’s politics and public schools” http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122411943821339043.html.

So, why is Ayers a free man—free to destroy young minds that deserve better? He’s never been pardoned the way Bill Clinton pardoned two members of the Weather Underground as he was leaving office. Linda Evans was sentenced to five years in prison for participating in several 1980s bombings. Susan Rosenberg was charged for her involvement in a bank robbery that spawned the deaths of two police officers and one guard. “She was apprehended with 740 pounds of explosives in her possession” http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/04/7998_clinton_bashes.html.

No-one was ever brought to justice for the rash of bombings, the murder of Police Sgt McDonnel, or the maiming of Officer Fogarty, but not because they were innocent or there was a lack of evidence against them. There was enough evidence to convict the leadership of the Weather Underground—including Ayers and Dohrn—for the “murders” of Diana Oughton, Ted Gold and Terry Robbins. All three were killed when an anti-personnel nail bomb they were producing exploded too soon.

Again, why no prosecution of Ayers and Dohrn? Because President Jimmy “New World Order” Carter included the Weather Underground in the amnesties he gave to all Vietnam War protestors. Carter's action stopped any attempt at justice for the victims of Ayers and Dohrn and allowed them to pursue lucrative careers brainwashing young minds to hate the United States, its government, its businesses, its education system.

Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn have been allowed to mold young minds into the New World Order version of brainwashing. They have been useful tools of a global takeover of every nation, including the United States. The children they train have a value system that’s the antithesis of what our Founders intended. Gauging the decades of indoctrination provided by Ayers and Dohrn, the numbers of children whose minds have been driven from the truth about America could be startling.

Is it any wonder Obama said he didn’t know Ayers well, though he did, or “he’s just a guy in my neighborhood?” Were he to admit close ties with the man, Obama’s own role in the New World Order fiaso would come to the forefront sounding an alarm from parts of the East Coast to the eastern borders of California (the state that loves globalism the most). Like dominos, our states are being stolen from us one-by-one as young people whose minds have been through some form of Ayers-style indoctrination in public schools, and state and private institutions, reach the age to vote.