In a recent article I wrote about Obama’s ties to Islam, I attempted to connect several dots that point to him speaking in some type of code, e.g. "campaigning in all 57 Muslim states," “my Muslim faith,” the use of the words “pig” and “fish,” and his background/relationships with relatives in Kenya (http://newswithviews.com/Walker/jill29.htm). However, something gnawed at me that led me to believe all the dots weren’t connected.   

For example, why did/does Obama find “solace” in his relationships with those who score a10-out-of-10 on the rebellion scale? Folks like Ayers and his cronies are not exactly mainstream America nor is the “Reverend” Jeremiah Wright. And what’s the connection between his Muslim background, and his anti-America, socialist background (inculcated in him as a small child by his mother, father, and eventually his stepfather, the latter of which were both Muslims)? Add the corrupt Chicago political machinery through which he rose to some sort of power and you have the makings of either a dormant sleeper cell or one who believes he can single-handedly destroy and then remake the U.S. in his own twisted imagewithout “we the people” batting an eyelash. Somewhere along the line, Obama became beholden to the Muslims and that IOU has probably come due. Regarding Obama’s admittance to Harvard Law School, Jack Cashill wrote: 

“As far back as 1988, however, Obama had serious pull. He would need it. As previously reported, Khalid al-Mansour, principle adviser to Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, lobbied friends like Manhattan Borough President Percy Sutton to intervene at Harvard on Obama's behalf. An orthodox Muslim, al-Mansour has not met the crackpot anti-Semitic theory he could not embrace. As for bin Talal, in October 2001, New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani sent his $10 million relief check back un-cashed after the Saudi billionaire blamed 9/11 on America (http://wnd.com/index.php?pageId=74877). 

Hence, Obama was admitted because of Muslim connections, not because of merit. This alone makes him guilty of the charge he makes against his opponents -- cronyism. The same is true, Cashill wrote, for his role as president of the Harvard Law Review. He never wrote a single article. The only paper he did write was heavily edited and demanded the death of babies that survived abortions.  

So why did al-Mansour go to such lengths for Obama unless there was a quid pro quo that hasn’t been brought to light? Maybe the quo of the agreement has finally come due? “We the people” only have to look at what’s happened in Great Britain with the enforcement of Sharia law for the ramifications of an Obama presidency to become crystal clear (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2957428/Sharia-law-courts-operating-in-Britain.html).

Proof of Obama’s relationship with “cutting edge” terrorists was his unpublicized May 14, 2008, meeting at Macomb Community College with Imam Hassan Qazwini.  The Imam heads the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, Michigan, and according to Debbie Schlussel, Qazwini is the front man in the U.S. for the terror group Hezbollah. He also openly supports HAMAS-ide bombings. I’m sure he was dancing on the head of a pin on 9/11. He’s a close friend of Hezbollah’s spiritual leader, Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, who called on Hezbollah terrorists “to kill more than 300 U.S. Marines and U.S. Embassy civilians in cold blood.” His mosque is a hotbed of anti-American sentiment where rallies and celebrations are held in support of Hezbollah,and many of his congregants are money launderers for that terror group. All this is taking place in America while the Democrats demand hate-crimes legislation.

Qazwini’s mosque has hosted visitors like Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, a racist at minimum. And it was Qazwini who defined Farrakhan as “our dear brother,” and “a freedom fighter” (http://www.debbiesch... 2008/05/the_company_he. html; and http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2008/05/six-degrees-of-barack-obama-updated.html).

For whom was he a “freedom fighter?” He certainly isn’t a freedom fighter for Americans, and definitely not for the Jewish people whom Farrakhan calls “the forces of Satan.” This alleged freedom fighter has called for a “jihad” on the American people.” I believe this is the epitome of hate speech; or was it just the prelude for Obama descending into the “Greek” temple as the Twelfth Imam? Perhaps he’s not the anti-Christ, but he sure is a good precursor -- the murder of aborted babies born alive (a nice sacrifice to the forces of darkness), support of the homosexual “movement,” the destruction of “white America.”

But connecting ALL the dots is easy when we understand Black Liberation Theology, which was founded in North America by James Cone, a Protestant minister who experienced the cruelties of segregation while growing up in Arkansas. He saw how white Christians treated blacks, even after federal desegregation of the South. The behavior of white southern Christians did not square with what he called the Christian messages of peace (was that one of the messages?) and loving thy neighbor as thyself. Black Liberation Theology grew out of the desire (as the Jews and other people groups have always desired) liberation from various forms of racism, oppression, and poverty.

“Cone argued that the white church and white theologians had all failed in their duties to uphold biblical principles of helping the poor and marginalized of society. Ergo, it was no longer acceptable to leave the interpretation of the Bible to white Christians. Blacks must take responsibility for their own religion and their own relationship with God. Black liberation theology has a great deal in common with the Black Power movement that also developed in the 1960s” (http://atheism.about... od/theology/ a/lib_black.htm).

Cone wrote in his book, Black Theology and Black Power: “Freedom is not a gift, but a responsibility, and thus must be taken against the will of those who hold us in bondage.” Others have uttered those sentiments throughout the ages and they were, in theory, quite correct. However, you cannot walk in the light and have favor from God if you hate your brother, whether you’re white or black. The problem with Black Liberation Theology is what happens when the wrong people, e.g. “Reverend” Jeremiah Wright, foment the wrong type of thinking. Black Liberation hates the middle class, so don’t bank on higher taxes producing refunds to the very class Obama detests.

According to Jeffrey Schmidt, “To listen to Wright -- more an apostle of the left than the Christian church -- the model for blacks is alienation, deep resentment, separation and grievance. All of which leads to militancy. Militancy is important. It's the sword dangled over the head of society. Either fork over more tax dollars, government services and patronage or else. And unlike the Reverend Moss [Wright’s successor at Obama’s church] and his kindred, I'll specify the ‘else’ as civil unrest, disruptions in cities, rioting in the streets, [dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria (with thanks to Bill Murray)]. Keeping blacks who fall into the orbit of a Reverend Wright at a near-boil is a card used by leftist agitators to serve their ends: they want bigger and more pervasive government -- and they want badly to run it” (http://www.americant... agenda_of_ black_liber.html). (I remember the frenzy that occurred when they ran the city school systems into the ground in Durham, N.C. and then the NAACP demanded there be one school district for city and county. And Black Liberation Theology wants to run the whole country? But, I do digress a bit . . .)

Forget, as Schmidt wrote, the Civil War and the thousands who died to end slavery, the civil rights movement and the many whites who gave their time and, in some cases, their lives to see justice for blacks in America, and the whites in government who voted to end unequal treatment of blacks, including affirmative action (which many view as reverse discrimination). Then understand that the messages of Black Liberation Theology, as espoused by Wright and his ilk are music to the ears of Islamists like Mansour and Qazwini who share a maniacal hatred of America.  

Add to that list Emil Jones, Jr., Bill Ayers, Bernadette Dohrn, Frank Marshall Davis, and a host of other “model” anti-Americans and Obama’s affiliation with Trinity United Church of Christ, a bastion for socialism and racial animus, becomes clear. He can appear to be a Christian, though his Church has wildly perverted Christianity and Cone’s belief in a message of peace and brotherly love into one of race baiting and race hatred. However, it’s an acceptable institution to the Muslims who support Obama because the messages ring the same.

The Muslims are mortgaged heavily in Obama and they’re clearly calling in their IOUs, promissory notes, and loans. Let’s just hope that Lehman Brothers is holding the mortgage on Obama’s soul because right now the forces of darkness have a strong lien on it. Obama’s “church” was a fraud to get voters to believe he’s a Christian. In reality, the ideologies espoused by Wright align perfectly with Islam which is why those to whom Obama is indebted don’t mind his membership in such a lofty den of “brotherly love.” It’s just more of the same scam that allowed Obama to move through the ranks to become the poster boy for the Democrat party. God (who is not Allah) help us all if he does win the election. Obama isn’t nearly as good at paying back those who help him as he is taking what “we the people” have to offer  . . . as has been documented by his lack of charitable donations.