The Democrats lie to win because winning is more important than the path taken to get there. There’s usually an honorable way to win, but the Democrats really don’t want to take a chance. Allowing illegals to vote, fighting against the requirement of IDs before voting, ACORN, Motor Voter, etc., are all schemes to guarantee victory while cheapening American citizenship and Americans.

Muslims do the same as did the Nazis. (Remember the ballot stuffing in Kenya when Odinga ran for president with the help of Senator Obama?) Muslims are taught from cradle to grave that the Qu’ran teaches that a lie is honorable if it advances the cause of Islam. The fact that the “cause” must be supported by no-so-noble means is irrelevant. Like the Democrats, triumph is the name of the game no matter who gets hurt, no matter how many die, no matter what the cost to human dignity and life. Ironically, Nazis advanced their “cause” in much the same way. A little propaganda, a lot of lies, blame the opposition for all the ills (even if your side created them) and the games were won. And even though it was only for a season, the toll on human life was exponential.

All three use scare tactics, whether real or unreal, truthful or untruthful. For the Democrats, it might be something simple like scaring senior citizens that their social security benefits will disappear if Republicans win elections. I haven’t seen those benefits disappear under any Republican leadership, but seniors still panic so the lie resonates. Regarding Muslims and Nazis, go a bit deeper in their use of scare tactics. They fully embrace and employ the fear factor—death by beheading would make any normal personal cringe and roll over in submission.

Democrats silence opposing speech. Their desire to restore The Fairness (really UNFairness) Doctrine is a classic example of silencing “we the people” and voices of individualism and liberty. The Nazis did the same and tortured or killed the opposition. Obama grew up with a few Muslim parents and is not the least bit afraid to ban, silence, or toss out those who oppose him. God help us all when he allows Sharia Law to become part of the United States—“we the people” might have to redress a few grievances against our government, if we’re even allowed to speak. And we know that Muslims just imprison, or torture, or murder those who speak out against them. Their methods range from beheadings to being tossed into large paper shredders which is their version of being shredded personally and professionally by the MSM. It’s not a stretch to acknowledge that those tactics receive the unfettered support of the MSM—a cabal of lily livered sapsuckers that works overtime spewing propaganda to humiliate and ridicule “we the people.”  

Democrats believe that all sexuality is acceptable even when “we the people” disagree and find much of it rather perverse. Prostitution is just great as is “intergenerational sex." (Mohammed married a six-year-old girl and took her to bed when she was nine. A Muslim cleric recently announced that sex with a girl of nine is acceptable because that’s what “The Prophet” did.) And although Muslims claim to be pure and imprison their women in lives that make a day in hell a walk in the park, their behavior indicates otherwise. Rape is common, with the victim (not the perpetrator) being put to death. The Nazis were totally perverse, especially in their treatment of women and boys in concentration camps.

Pondering the machinations of those on the left side of the political spectrum is a daunting task, at best. Having marginally been on that side at one time, I decided to revisit my reasons for my semi-liberal choices. That was almost as daunting as my original pondering, but I finally realized that what attracted me to that side was the "anything goes" attitude of those raggamuffin hippies of yore.

It wasn't so much that they didn't believe government didn't belong in the abortion, free-love (which isn't free and comes at great cost) venues, it was just the opposite. They didn't want to leave government out of the mix, they wanted our government, founded on Biblical truths, values and principles, to do a complete 180 legislatively and judicially.

Since the late 1960s, I've watched the left chip away (with large, ungodly chisels) at everything sacred and decent about the United States. Our churches and synagogues became social clubs, our schools became government training grounds for the atheists and other anti-God miscreants, and our families were shredded into barely recognizable remnants of the families in which we spent our childhoods. Mostly, God, in the eyes of many Americans, became whatever they wanted Him to be, notwithstanding how He defined Himself in Scripture. Right about now, God should be suing all of us for defamation.

Adding insult to injury, when those He rescued from spiritual rebellion, finally were right with Him, we didn't fight back. We sat by complacently thinking it couldn't get worse, but it did. Repeatedly, we told ourselves that the worst was over and our children would come to their senses. After all, we were raising them properly. And while we said this to ourselves, we stopped going to church, stopped worshipping God (as opposed to Allah, the moon god), and embraced everything secular. We even believed that liberal lie that the Founders really did put "separation of church and state" into our Constitution (unless you live in California where only Judeo-Christianity is targeted while Islam is taught to school children).

In a nutshell, "we the people" blew it big time; and then we blamed government for all the ills that were spawned in California and made their way east . . . even into the Bible Belt.

Finally, they told us that God died. Yes, indeedy, the God of the Bible, the Creator of the Universe had finally packed it in, and they said we were well rid of Him and His pesky Son and the Holy Spirit. After all, who needs them now that we've become enlightened? Morals? Forget it. Morals are relative, they said, to whatever we want, to whatever the situation reveals. Absent solid standards of morality, they created an atmosphere in which we drifted like garbage floating in a polluted river.

And now, many of us who pray daily, pray often, pray from the heart are left to hope to the God they said was dead that it's not too late to save a few more sick souls from a bad ending. We pray that it's not over for the United States. We pray that God will intervene and set us ALL spinning back in His direction. Unfortunately, like the serpent in the Garden of Eden, there is still rebellion in the wind and God's competitors are still arguing about who will reign supreme.

Rumor has it that this competition is fierce. According to that bastion of  brotherly love and charity (unless you're Caucasian or Jewish, etc.), Louis Farrakhan, and Bill Ayers (who dedicated his book to Lucifer), Jesus isn't needed anymore because we have Barry "The One" Obama. Oh the thrill the left feels when they talk about their newly crowned messiah who will lead them into a new America that will bear no resemblance to anything godly. Nope, that's not what they want and there's one good reason: SIN.

With God--Father, Son, and Holy Spirit--acknowledgement of sin means realizing that anything God wouldn't do, that we do, is sin. Not so with Barry. Sin, to Barry, is a whole new deal that's in direct contravention to the Scriptures.

I haven't read one word in the Bible about race warfare, have you? Or abortion being godly? I haven't read one word about stealing elections to win because winning is the name of the game. I haven't read one word about lying being acceptable to get the gold ring. But that's exactly what their new, improved messiah deems acceptable. The left finally has a "god" who will let them do as they please while he and they persecute the rest of us. They have a "god" who will destroy all that is good while blaming "we the people" for the destruction. They have a "god" who will make Bill Clinton look like a walk in the park.

The left needs a created messiah because the real one--the Creator, Jesus (Yeshua)--demands more than their pride and arrogance will permit. He asks them to repent for their sins--sins that have nothing to do with the pitiful political sludge spawned by Obama and his cabal: Wright, Ayers, Farrakhan, et al. (Odd that Islam says it's not a sin to do anything that advances the cause of Islam: killing, murdering, rape, lying, stealing, bombing . . . the list is probably endless. Yep, just say you're advancing Islam and it's suddenly acceptable.)

Should the "O" win the election--and lest God (the real one) intervenes--it's going to be tough times for those who won't follow the great "O." I'd say "take his mark," but I'm still not certain that he's the anti-Christ. Close, but maybe not. However, he's not the God I worship and I do hope he forgives me for not voting for him. I just can't advance his causes because they run contrary to everything my God--the one I pray will bless America--said in His Word.

With all the justifiable hoopla about Barry O's relationship with domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn, I can't help but wonder how the hand of the law didn't reel them in long ago. There's no statute of limitations on murder, and Ayers and Dohrn have all but admitted to their roles in the bombings of the Pentagon, the Capital Building, and the bombing of a police station wherein one police officer was killed. A rather lengthy history on the Weather Underground can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weatherman_(organization). The current issues surrounding Ayers, in particular, are more interesting. According to Matthew K. Tabor:

“Bill Ayers’ March election to the post of Vice President of Curriculum Studies for the American Educational Research Association [AERA] raised a few eyebrows - albeit too few - in the great education debate. There’s been quite a bit of discussion since Sol Stern wrote his most recent piece about Ayers in City Journal in which he introduces, as have some pundits, Ayers’ connection to Senator Barack Obama ["Obama's Real Ayers Problem"]. Primary politics aside, some thought that electing an unrepentant terrorist to AERA’s ranks was a mistake; others, however, found that insinuation shameful http://www.matthewktabor.com/ 2008/05/19/revisiting-aera-bill-ayers-the-weather-underground-and-public-education/ and http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/ eduwonkette /2008/05/dean_millots_comment_on_the_ay.html.

 “The [AERA] Council might consider whether it’s prudent to allow a former terrorist to join its ranks—particularly a man who said as late as 2001 that “I don’t regret setting bombs; I feel we didn’t do enough.” …

“Is there any doubt that the election of a former terrorist to the organization’s governance body is 'contrary to the interests' of the Association?

In another article (http://www.matthewktabor.com/2008/10/17/yes-bill-ayers-is-a-school-destroyer-social-justice-aint-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/), Tabor included a statement by Sol Stern, Contributing Editor to City Journal and a Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow:

“I’ve studied Mr. Ayers’s work for years and read most of his books. His hatred of America is as virulent as when he planted a bomb at the Pentagon. And this hatred informs his educational “reform” efforts. Of course, Mr. Obama isn’t going to appoint him to run the education department. But the media mainstreaming of a figure like Mr. Ayers could have terrible consequences for the country’s politics and public schools” http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122411943821339043.html.

So, why is Ayers a free man—free to destroy young minds that deserve better? He’s never been pardoned the way Bill Clinton pardoned two members of the Weather Underground as he was leaving office. Linda Evans was sentenced to five years in prison for participating in several 1980s bombings. Susan Rosenberg was charged for her involvement in a bank robbery that spawned the deaths of two police officers and one guard. “She was apprehended with 740 pounds of explosives in her possession” http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/04/7998_clinton_bashes.html.

No-one was ever brought to justice for the rash of bombings, the murder of Police Sgt McDonnel, or the maiming of Officer Fogarty, but not because they were innocent or there was a lack of evidence against them. There was enough evidence to convict the leadership of the Weather Underground—including Ayers and Dohrn—for the “murders” of Diana Oughton, Ted Gold and Terry Robbins. All three were killed when an anti-personnel nail bomb they were producing exploded too soon.

Again, why no prosecution of Ayers and Dohrn? Because President Jimmy “New World Order” Carter included the Weather Underground in the amnesties he gave to all Vietnam War protestors. Carter's action stopped any attempt at justice for the victims of Ayers and Dohrn and allowed them to pursue lucrative careers brainwashing young minds to hate the United States, its government, its businesses, its education system.

Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn have been allowed to mold young minds into the New World Order version of brainwashing. They have been useful tools of a global takeover of every nation, including the United States. The children they train have a value system that’s the antithesis of what our Founders intended. Gauging the decades of indoctrination provided by Ayers and Dohrn, the numbers of children whose minds have been driven from the truth about America could be startling.

Is it any wonder Obama said he didn’t know Ayers well, though he did, or “he’s just a guy in my neighborhood?” Were he to admit close ties with the man, Obama’s own role in the New World Order fiaso would come to the forefront sounding an alarm from parts of the East Coast to the eastern borders of California (the state that loves globalism the most). Like dominos, our states are being stolen from us one-by-one as young people whose minds have been through some form of Ayers-style indoctrination in public schools, and state and private institutions, reach the age to vote.